Monday, June 06, 2005

Now Coursey cites "dire need" for high-density growth

Press Democrat columnist Chris Coursey wrote in February,

the city is presented with a proposal to spoil yet another ridge in Fountaingrove. Aegis Assisted Living seeks the city's permission to build a 250-unit gated community off Fountain Grove Parkway. ’Varenna’ would provide detached homes and assisted living for retirees.

There's no doubt there's a market and -- as baby boomers age -- a growing need for such a facility. … But is a prominent 600-foot ridge the ‘ideal location,’ as project manager William Mabry told planners?

The city General Plan includes a goal to ‘preserve and enhance Santa Rosa's scenic character ... including hillsides.’ Varenna's developers plan to ‘hide’ the massive project by flattening out the top of the ridge and planting trees, but an environmental study says it still will ‘interrupt the skyline.’

City policy allows ridge-top development if the project ‘minimizes visual prominence’ and ‘minimizes alteration of topography.’ That policy provides no definition of ‘minimizes.’ But if policy-makers apply the same standards to this project as they have to previous development at Fountaingrove, you can kiss another ridgeline goodbye
.” (2/14/05, “Thoughts from high above, down below”)

Keep that in mind as we continue. Coursey wrote today,

anyone living next to developable land within city limits in Sonoma County should brace themselves. What's built next door is most likely not going to look like your neighborhood.

He was touting Windsor’s approval of Orrin Theissen’s latest “smart growth” project there:

the Town Council last month unanimously approved a project featuring 2½-story buildings with condominiums over retail space on Old Redwood Highway. Orrin Thiessen's project was approved despite opposition from residents of the Oak Creek subdivision, who said the tall buildings and intense development don't belong alongside their neighborhood of single-family homes on large lots."

Coursey claimed ”Oak Creek is a classic example of sprawl - large homes on lots ranging from a quarter-acre to one acre that were built on bare land in a subdivision that has one entry and exit on Old Redwood Highway. “ And he explained,

What the council realized is that developments like Oak Creek should be a thing of the past in Sonoma County, while developments like Thiessen's should be the wave of the future. … Thiessen is using an acre of land on a major thoroughfare to build a mixed-use project with 15 residences that will sell for less than the price of a median home.” (6/6/05, "When a city's needs trump a neighborhood's")

Coursey also wants more intense growth in Santa Rosa. He asked today,

Does Santa Rosa have so much developable land that it can afford to slash the density on a large parcel on a major thoroughfare within walking distance of shopping and schools, trails and bus lines? The answer is no

His example this time was a revised plan for the 14.8 acres of Church property--including the historic Carrillo Adobe--east of St. Eugene’s on Montgomery Drive:

Instead of 265 apartments - a project that was approved by the Planning Commission but shot down on a 3-2 vote of the City Council - Barry Swenson Builders of San Jose now plans 140 market-rate condos and 25 apartments for low-income seniors on the property. That will reduce the density to 11 units an acre, from the original 18.

Neighbors, who joined with historic preservationists to block the original project, said they can live with the new plan. Compromise is preferable to conflict.

But let's remember that this compromise lops 100 homes from Santa Rosa's future housing stock. It also trades apartments for condos that will cost up to $800,000.


That’s arguable, just as Theissen's project next to Oak Creek in Windsor is arguable. But how could anyone justify building 265 apartments across from Montgomery Village, on congested Highway 12?

Oak Creek may have been suburban “sprawl” when it was first built. But Oak Creek was the kind of California suburban living its residents were looking for. So how does that justify building urban-style, high density residential and commercial uses next door?

Then Coursey blew it entirely, when he used Varenna at Fountaingrove to make his case. He wrote:

I offer Exhibit C - the Planning Commission's recent decision to approve a 250-unit luxury retirement community straddling a ridge line at Fountaingrove.The project violates city policy prohibiting building on hill tops, but planners said the city's need for senior housing - even senior housing with $1 million entry fees - outweighed the need to protect scenic vistas.

If the need is truly that dire, then it is even more critical that our decision makers choose to risk the ire of neighbors, as the Windsor council did last month, rather than to spread the effects of sprawl, which is the likely consequence of the downsizing of the Adobe project.” [emphasis added]

I think Coursey knows the need is not all that dire. The Planning Commission simply made a political decision to violate City design policy for Varenna at Fountaingrove. City Hall did the same thing for all those other million-dollar sore thumbs on Rincon Ridge, just a few years ago.

While we’re talking about developer/banker Bill Gallaher’s Varenna at Fountaingrove, it’s no surprise the PD has published several stories about Varenna--and many expensive display ads promoting it--without ever mentioning that former Mayor Sharon Wright works for Gallaher.

Wright is or was Director of Marketing for Oakmont Senior Living LLC. Varenna’s website says Oakmont Senior Living is “the real estate and construction arm of Áegis Senior Living”.

Wright just left City Hall in December. During most of her tenure on the Council, she was the paid Executive Director of the Sonoma County Alliance, the countywide developer/business lobby. Now she’s an Alliance director again, representing Aegis Senior Living.

1 Comments:

At 3:49 AM, Blogger shane54charlotte said...

='Brand New News From The Timber Industry!!'=

========Latest Profile==========
Energy & Asset Technology, Inc. (EGTY)
Current Price $0.15
================================

Recognize this undiscovered gem which is poised to jump!!

Please read the following Announcement in its Entierty and
Consider the Possibilities
Watch this One to Trade!

Because, EGTY has secured the global rights to market
genetically enhanced fast growing, hard-wood trees!

EGTY trading volume is beginning to surge with landslide Announcement.
The value of this Stock appears poised for growth! This one will not
remain on the ground floor for long.

Keep Reading!!!!

===============
"BREAKING NEWS"
===============

-Energy and Asset Technology, Inc. (EGTY) owns a global license to market
the genetically enhanced Global Cedar growth trees, with plans to
REVOLUTIONIZE the forest-timber industry.

These newly enhanced Global Cedar trees require only 9-12 years of growth before they can
be harvested for lumber, whereas worldwide growth time for lumber is 30-50 years.

Other than growing at an astonishing rate, the Global Cedar has a number of other benefits.
Its natural elements make it resistant to termites, and the lack of oils and sap found in the wood
make it resistant to forest fire, ensuring higher returns on investments.

the wood is very lightweight and strong, lighter than Poplar and over twice
as strong as Balsa, which makes it great for construction. It also has
the unique ability to regrow itself from the stump, minimizing the land and
time to replant and develop new root systems.

Based on current resources and agreements, EGTY projects revenues of $140 Million
with an approximate profit margin of 40% for each 9-year cycle. With anticipated
growth, EGTY is expected to challenge Deltic Timber Corp. during its initial 9-year cycle.

Deltic Timber Corp. currently trades at over $38.00 a share with about $153 Million in revenues.
As the reputation and demand for the Global Cedar tree continues to grow around the world
EGTY believes additional multi-million dollar agreements will be forthcoming. The Global Cedar nursery has produced
about 100,000 infant plants and is developing a production growth target of 250,000 infant plants per month.

Energy and Asset Technology is currently in negotiations with land and business owners in New Zealand,
Greece and Malaysia regarding the purchase of their popular and profitable fast growing infant tree plants.
Inquiries from the governments of Brazil and Ecuador are also being evaluated.

Conclusion:

The examples above show the Awesome, Earning Potential of little
known Companies That Explode onto Investor�s Radar Screens.
This stock will not be a Secret for long. Then You May Feel the Desire to Act Right
Now! And Please Watch This One Trade!!


GO EGTY!


All statements made are our express opinion only and should be treated as such.
We may own, take position and sell any securities mentioned at any time. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect
to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are
not statements of historical fact and may be "forward, looking
statements." forward, looking statements are based on expectations, estimates
and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results
or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. This newsletter was paid $3,000 from third party (IR Marketing).
Forward,|ooking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects". in compliance with Se'ction 17. {b), we disclose the holding of EGTY shares prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. Since we own shares, there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward,looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties that could cause results to
differ materially from those set forth in the forward- looking statements. This is not solicitation to buy or sell stocks, this text is
or informational purpose only and you should seek professional advice from registered financial advisor before you do anything related with buying or selling stocks, penny stocks are very high risk and you can lose your entire investment.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home